IMF Loans and Economic Sovereignty: Reform or Repetition?
- Focus on Stabilization, Not Growth
IMF plans prioritize stability, delaying real economic progress. - Public Suffers from Tax Measures
Indirect taxes and tariff hikes raise cost of living. - Devaluation Has Mixed Results
Boosts exports but raises import and production costs. - Short-Term Relief Only
Loans offer temporary support, not lasting solutions. - External Control Increases
IMF backing needed to access other global loans.
Summary:
The IMF’s bailout package offers temporary financial relief but comes with long-term trade-offs. It places the burden of reforms on the general public through inflation and increased utility costs. While devaluation may help exports, it also disrupts local industries due to higher input costs. Dependency on foreign aid risks undermining national autonomy. True recovery needs structural reforms, not repeated bailouts that compromise economic sovereignty.
For complete article please visit following link